LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
CrPC, 1973
Start Practicing
CrPCChapter XXVIIISection 367
Section367

Power to direct further inquiry to be made or additional evidence to be taken

AI Assist

Summary

High Court can order further inquiry or take additional evidence on any point affecting a convicted person’s guilt or innocence when the case is before it. It may do the inquiry itself or direct the Sessions Court to do so. The convicted person need not be present unless the High Court orders otherwise, and the results must be reported back to the High Court.

Example

Priya is convicted of theft and her appeal reaches the High Court. The court wants more proof about her alibi and directs the Sessions Court to record fresh witnesses; Priya need not attend unless the High Court orders her presence. The Sessions Court sends the new evidence back to the High Court.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) If, when such proceedings are submitted, the High Court thinks that a further inquiry should be made into or additional evidence taken upon, any point bearing upon the guilt or innocence of the convicted person, it may make such inquiry or take such evidence itself, or direct it to be made or taken by the Court of Session.

(2) Unless the High Court otherwise directs, the presence of the convicted person may be dispensed with when such inquiry is made or such evidence is taken.

(3) When the inquiry or evidence (if any) is not made or taken by the High Court, the result of such inquiry or evidence shall be certified to such Court.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXVIII

Chapter XXVIII

Submission Of Death Sentences For Confirmation

In this chapter

  • 366Sentence of death to be submitted by Court of Session for confirmation
  • 367Power to direct further inquiry to be made or additional evidence to be taken
  • 368Power of High Court to confirm sentence or annul conviction
  • 369Confirmation or new sentence to be signed by two Judges
  • 370Procedure in case of difference of opinion
  • 371Procedure in cases submitted to High Court for confirmation
Previous · Section 366Sentence of death to be submitted by Court of Session for confirmationNext · Section 368Power of High Court to confirm sentence or annul conviction