LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BNSS, 2023
Start Practicing
BNSSChapter XXVIISection 369
Section369

Release of person of unsound mind pending investigation or trial

AI Assist

Summary

When an accused cannot defend due to unsoundness of mind or intellectual disability, the court shall normally grant bail if they do not need in-patient care and a friend or relative undertakes regular outpatient psychiatric care and to prevent harm. If bail or such an undertaking is not possible, the court must place the accused where psychiatric treatment is available and report to the State; any public detention must follow Mental Healthcare Act rules. The court may discharge on medical opinion with adequate security, or transfer the accused to a residential care facility for education, training and care.

Example

Ravi is charged after a neighbourhood fight, but a psychiatric exam shows he cannot understand the proceedings due to intellectual disability. The court releases Ravi on bail after his sister agrees to take him for regular outpatient psychiatric care and to keep him from harming others. If she had not given that undertaking, the court would have placed him where regular psychiatric treatment could be provided.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) Whenever a person if found under section 367 or section 368 to be incapable of entering defence by reason of unsoundness of mind or intellectual disability, the Magistrate or Court, as the case may be, shall, whether the case is one in which bail may be taken or not, order release of such person on bail:

Provided that the accused is suffering from unsoundness of mind or intellectual disability which does not mandate in-patient treatment and a friend or relative undertakes to obtain regular out-patient psychiatric treatment from the nearest medical facility and to prevent from doing injury to himself or to any other person.

(2) If the case is one in which, in the opinion of the Magistrate or Court, as the case may be, bail cannot be granted or if an appropriate undertaking is not given, he or it shall order the accused to be kept in such a place where regular psychiatric treatment can be provided, and shall report the action taken to the State Government:

Provided that no order for the detention of the accused in a public mental health establishment shall be made otherwise than in accordance with such rules as the State Government may have made under the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.

(3) Whenever a person is found under section 367 or section 368 to be incapable of entering defence by reason of unsoundness of mind or intellectual disability, the Magistrate or Court, as the case may be, shall keeping in view the nature of the act committed and the extent of unsoundness of mind or intellectual disability, further determine if the release of the accused can be ordered:

Provided that-

  • (a) if on the basis of medical opinion or opinion of a specialist, the Magistrate or Court, as the case may be, decide to order discharge of the accused, as provided under section 367 or section 368, such release may be ordered, if sufficient security is given that the accused shall be prevented from doing injury to himself or to any other person;

  • (b) if the Magistrate or Court, as the case may be, is of the opinion that discharge of the accused cannot be ordered, the transfer of the accused to a residential facility for persons with unsoundness of mind or intellectual disability may be ordered wherein the accused may be provided care and appropriate education and training.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXVII

Chapter XXVII

Provisions as to Accused Persons of Unsound Mind

In this chapter

  • 367Procedure in case of accused being person of unsound mind
  • 368Procedure in case of person of unsound mind tried before Court
  • 369Release of person of unsound mind pending investigation or trial
  • 370Resumption of inquiry or trial
  • 371Procedure on accused appearing before Magistrate or Court
  • 372When accused appears to have been of sound mind
  • 373Judgment of acquittal on ground of unsoundness of mind
  • 374Person acquitted on ground of unsoundness of mind to be detained in safe custody
  • 375Power of State Government to empower officer in charge to discharge
  • 376Procedure where prisoner of unsound mind is reported capable of making his defence
  • 377Procedure where person of unsound mind detained is declared fit to be released
  • 378Delivery of person of unsound mind to care of relative or friend
Previous · Section 368Procedure in case of person of unsound mind tried before CourtNext · Section 370Resumption of inquiry or trial