LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BSA, 2023
Start Practicing
BSAChapter IXSection 133
Section133

Privilege not waived by volunteering evidence

AI Assist

Summary

Giving evidence in your own suit does not automatically waive lawyer‑client confidentiality or other protected communications. If you call your advocate as a witness, you consent to disclosure only for the specific matters you put to the advocate that you otherwise could not reveal. Simply testifying, or calling your lawyer without asking about privileged advice, keeps confidentiality intact.

Example

Priya testifies in her own suit about a damaged shop counter. Her speaking in court does not waive her lawyer‑client confidentiality. Later she calls her advocate and only asks about the date she was in the shop, not about legal advice, so the advocate cannot be forced to disclose privileged communications.

Bare Act

Enacted text

If any party to a suit gives evidence therein at his own instance or otherwise, he shall not be deemed to have consented thereby to such disclosure as is mentioned in section 132; and, if any party to a suit or proceeding calls any such advocate, as a witness, he shall be deemed to have consented to such disclosure only if he questions such advocate, on matters which, but for such question, he would not be at liberty to disclose.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

IX

Chapter IX

Of Witnesses

In this chapter

  • 124Who may testify
  • 125Witness unable to communicate verbally
  • 126Competency of husband and wife as witnesses in certain cases
  • 127Judges and Magistrates
  • 128Communications During marriage
  • 129Evidence as to affairs of State
  • 130Official communications
  • 131Information as to commission of offences
  • 132Professional communications
  • 133Privilege not waived by volunteering evidence
  • 134Confidential communication with legal advisers
  • 135Production of title-deeds of witness not a party
  • 136Production of documents or electronic records which another person, having possession, could refuse to produce
  • 137Witness not excused from answering on ground that answer will criminate
  • 138Accomplice
  • 139Number of witnesses
Previous · Section 132Professional communicationsNext · Section 134Confidential communication with legal advisers