LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BSA, 2023
Start Practicing
BSAChapter VIISection 112
Section112

Burden of proof as to relationship in the cases of partners, landlord and tenant, principal and agent

AI Assist

Summary

When people have been acting as partners, landlord and tenant, or principal and agent, the person who asserts they are not (or have ceased to be) in that relationship must prove it. The rule applies after their conduct shows the relationship. Mere denial without evidence is insufficient.

Example

Rohan and Sneha ran a shop together and shared profits for a year, so they acted as partners. Rohan now claims they were never partners. Under this rule Rohan must bring evidence to prove he is right, because their conduct showed a partnership.

Bare Act

Enacted text

When the question is whether persons are partners, landlord and tenant, or principal and agent, and it has been shown that they have been acting as such, the burden of proving that they do not stand, or have ceased to stand, to each other in those relationships respectively, is on the person who affirms it.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

VII

Chapter VII

Of The Burden of Proof

In this chapter

  • 104Burden of proof
  • 105On whom burden of proof lies
  • 106Burden of proof as to particular fact
  • 107Burden of proving fact to be proved to make evidence admissible
  • 108Burden of proving that case of accused comes within exceptions
  • 109Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge
  • 110Burden of proving death of person known to have been alive within thirty years
  • 111Burden of proving that person is alive who has not been heard of for seven years
  • 112Burden of proof as to relationship in the cases of partners, landlord and tenant, principal and agent
  • 113Burden of proof as to ownership
  • 114Proof of good faith in transactions where one party is in relation of active confidence
  • 115Presumption as to certain offences
  • 116Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy
  • 117Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman
  • 118Presumption as to dowry death
  • 119Court may Presume existence of certain facts
  • 120Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecution for rape
Previous · Section 111Burden of proving that person is alive who has not been heard of for seven yearsNext · Section 113Burden of proof as to ownership