LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BSA, 2023
Start Practicing
BSAChapter VIISection 120
Section120

Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecution for rape

AI Assist

Summary

In a rape prosecution where the court finds the accused had sexual intercourse and the woman, in her evidence, states she did not consent, the court will presume she did not consent. The presumption applies when her statement is given as part of her evidence. "Sexual intercourse" means the acts listed in section 63.

Example

Ravi is accused of rape and medical and forensic evidence show he had sexual intercourse with Priya. Priya testifies in court that she did not consent. Under this rule the court must presume Priya did not consent, so Ravi must produce evidence to challenge that presumption.

Bare Act

Enacted text

In a prosecution for rape under sub-section (2) of section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, where sexual intercourse by the accused is proved and the question is whether it was without the consent of the woman alleged to have been raped and such woman states in her evidence before the Court that she did not consent, the Court shall presume that she did not consent.

Explanation.-In this section, "sexual intercourse" shall mean any of the acts mentioned in section 63 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

VII

Chapter VII

Of The Burden of Proof

In this chapter

  • 104Burden of proof
  • 105On whom burden of proof lies
  • 106Burden of proof as to particular fact
  • 107Burden of proving fact to be proved to make evidence admissible
  • 108Burden of proving that case of accused comes within exceptions
  • 109Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge
  • 110Burden of proving death of person known to have been alive within thirty years
  • 111Burden of proving that person is alive who has not been heard of for seven years
  • 112Burden of proof as to relationship in the cases of partners, landlord and tenant, principal and agent
  • 113Burden of proof as to ownership
  • 114Proof of good faith in transactions where one party is in relation of active confidence
  • 115Presumption as to certain offences
  • 116Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy
  • 117Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman
  • 118Presumption as to dowry death
  • 119Court may Presume existence of certain facts
  • 120Presumption as to absence of consent in certain prosecution for rape
Previous · Section 119Court may Presume existence of certain factsNext · Section 121Estoppel