LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BSA, 2023
Start Practicing
BSAChapter VISection 101
Section101

Evidence as to meaning of illegible characters, etc

AI Assist

Summary

Allows evidence to explain unclear or unusual words or marks in a document. Applies when characters are illegible or when words are foreign, obsolete, technical, local or regional expressions, abbreviations, or used in a peculiar sense. The court may admit such evidence to show the intended meaning.

Example

Ravi, a sculptor, agrees to sell to Priya "all my mods". Ravi owns both his finished models and the modelling tools. Evidence may be led to show whether he meant to sell the models, the tools, or both.

Bare Act

Enacted text

Evidence may be given to show the meaning of illegible or not commonly intelligible characters, of foreign, obsolete, technical, local and regional expressions, of abbreviations and of words used in a peculiar sense.

Illustration.

A, sculptor, agrees to sell to B, "all my mods". A has both models and modelling tools. Evidence may be given to show which he meant to sell.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

VI

Chapter VI

Of The Exclusion of Oral Evidence by Documentary Evidence

In this chapter

  • 94Evidence of terms of contracts, grants and other dispositions of property reduced to form of document
  • 95Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement
  • 96Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document
  • 97Exclusion of Evidence against application of document to existing facts
  • 98Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts
  • 99Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons
  • 100Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies
  • 101Evidence as to meaning of illegible characters, etc
  • 102Who may give evidence of agreement varying terms of document
  • 103Saving of provisions of Indian Succession Act relating to wills
Previous · Section 100Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly appliesNext · Section 102Who may give evidence of agreement varying terms of document