LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
CrPC, 1973
Start Practicing
CrPCChapter XXIVSection 308
Section308

Trial of person not complying with conditions of pardon

AI Assist

Summary

If a person accepted a conditional pardon but the Public Prosecutor certifies they wilfully concealed something essential or gave false evidence, they may be tried for the original offence or any related offence and also for giving false evidence. They cannot be tried jointly with other accused, and a trial for giving false evidence needs High Court sanction. The accused may plead that they complied; the prosecution must prove non compliance, and if the court finds compliance it must acquit.

Example

Priya, a shopkeeper, accepted a conditional pardon in return for full disclosure about a theft. Later the Public Prosecutor certifies she hid a key fact and gave false evidence; she can be tried for the theft and for giving false evidence, but not jointly with other accused, and the trial for false evidence needs High Court sanction. If Priya pleads she complied, prosecution must prove otherwise, and if the court finds she did comply she must be acquitted.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) Where, in regard to a person who has accepted a tender of pardon made under section 306 or section 307, the Public Prosecutor certifies that in his opinion such person has, either by wilfully concealing anything essential or by giving false evidence, not complied with the condition on which the tender was made, such person may be tried for the offence in respect of which the pardon was so tendered or for any other offence of which he appears to have been guilty in connection with the same matter, and also for the offence of giving false evidence:

Provided that such person shall not be tried jointly with any of the other accused

Provided further that such person shall not be tried for the offence of giving false evidence except with the sanction of the High Court, and nothing contained in section 195 or section 340 shall apply to that offence.

(2) Any statement made by such person accepting the tender of pardon and recorded by a Magistrate under section 164 or by a Court under Sub-Section (4) of section 306 may be given in evidence against him at such trial.

(3) At such trial, the accused shall be entitled to plead that he has complied with the condition upon which such tender was made, in which case it shall be for the prosecution to prove that the condition has not been complied with.

(4) At such trial the Court shall-

  • (a) if it is a Court of Session, before the charge is read out and explained to the accused;

  • (b) if it is the Court of a Magistrate before the evidence of the witnesses for the prosecution is taken.
    ask the accused whether he pleads that he has complied with the conditions on which the tender of pardon was made.

(5) If the accused does so plead, the Court shall record the plea and proceed with the trial and it shall, before passing judgment in the case, find whether or not the accused has complied with the conditions of the pardon, and, if it finds that he has so complied, it shall notwithstanding anything contained in this Code, pass judgment of acquittal.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXIV

Chapter XXIV

General Provisions As To Inquiries And Trials

In this chapter

  • 300Person once convicted or acquitted not to be tried for same offence
  • 301Appearance by public prosecutors
  • 302Permission to conduct prosecution
  • 303Right of person against whom proceedings are instituted to be defended
  • 304Legal aid to accused at State expense in certain cases
  • 305Procedure when corporation or registered society is an accused
  • 306Tender of pardon to accomplish
  • 307Power to direct tender of pardon
  • 308Trial of person not complying with conditions of pardon
  • 309Power to postpone or adjourn proceedings
  • 310Local inspection
  • 311Power to summon material witness, or examine person present
  • 311APower of Magistrate to order person to give specimen signature or handwriting
  • 313Power to examine the accused
  • 314Oral arguments and memorandum of arguments
  • 315Accused person to be competent witness
  • 316No influence to be used to induce disclosure
  • 317Provision for inquiries and trial being held in the absence of accused in certain cases
  • 318Procedure where accused does not understand proceedings
  • 319Power to proceed against other persons appearing to be guilty of offence
  • 320Compounding of offences
  • 321Withdrawal from prosecution
  • 322Procedure in cases which Magistrate cannot dispose of
  • 323Procedure when, after commencement of inquiry or trial, Magistrate finds case should be committed
  • 324Trial of persons previously convicted of offences against coinage, stamp law or property
  • 325Procedure when Magistrate can not pass sentence sufficiently severe
  • 326Conviction or commitment on evidence partly recorded by one Magistrate and partly by another
  • 327Court to be open
Previous · Section 307Power to direct tender of pardonNext · Section 309Power to postpone or adjourn proceedings