LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
CrPC, 1973
Start Practicing
CrPCChapter XXIVSection 313
Section313

Power to examine the accused

AI Assist

Summary

The court can question the accused at any stage, without prior warning, to let them explain circumstances shown by the evidence. After prosecution witnesses are examined and before the accused opens their defence, the court must question the accused generally; in a summons-case it may skip this if personal attendance was dispensed. No oath is administered; refusal or false answers do not attract punishment, and answers may be used in this or other trials. The court may take help from counsel or accept a written statement as compliance.

Example

Rohan is accused of damaging a shop lock. After the prosecution witnesses finish, the court questions Rohan before his defence; the court allows him to file a written statement instead. He is not put on oath and cannot be punished for refusing to answer, but his answers can be used in this or related trials.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) In every inquiry or trial, for the purpose of enabling the accused personally to explain any circumstances appearing in the evidence against him, the court-

  • (a) may at any stage, without previously warning the accused put such questions to him as the Court considers necessary;

  • (b) shall after the witnesses for the prosecution have been examined and before he is called on for his defence question him generally on the case:

Provided that in a summons-case where the Court has dispensed with the personal attendance of the accused, it may also dispense with his examination under clause (b).

(2) No oath shall be administered to the accused when he is examined under Sub-Section (1).

(3) The accused shall not render himself liable to punishment by refusing to answer such question, or by giving false answers to them.

(4) The answers given by the accused may be taken into consideration in such inquiry or trial, and put in evidence for or against him in any other inquiry into, or trial for, any other offence which such answers may tend to show he had committed.

(5) The Court may take help of Prosecutor and Defence Counsel in preparing relevant questions which are to be put to the accused and the Court may permit filing of written statement by the accused as sufficient compliance of this section.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXIV

Chapter XXIV

General Provisions As To Inquiries And Trials

In this chapter

  • 300Person once convicted or acquitted not to be tried for same offence
  • 301Appearance by public prosecutors
  • 302Permission to conduct prosecution
  • 303Right of person against whom proceedings are instituted to be defended
  • 304Legal aid to accused at State expense in certain cases
  • 305Procedure when corporation or registered society is an accused
  • 306Tender of pardon to accomplish
  • 307Power to direct tender of pardon
  • 308Trial of person not complying with conditions of pardon
  • 309Power to postpone or adjourn proceedings
  • 310Local inspection
  • 311Power to summon material witness, or examine person present
  • 311APower of Magistrate to order person to give specimen signature or handwriting
  • 313Power to examine the accused
  • 314Oral arguments and memorandum of arguments
  • 315Accused person to be competent witness
  • 316No influence to be used to induce disclosure
  • 317Provision for inquiries and trial being held in the absence of accused in certain cases
  • 318Procedure where accused does not understand proceedings
  • 319Power to proceed against other persons appearing to be guilty of offence
  • 320Compounding of offences
  • 321Withdrawal from prosecution
  • 322Procedure in cases which Magistrate cannot dispose of
  • 323Procedure when, after commencement of inquiry or trial, Magistrate finds case should be committed
  • 324Trial of persons previously convicted of offences against coinage, stamp law or property
  • 325Procedure when Magistrate can not pass sentence sufficiently severe
  • 326Conviction or commitment on evidence partly recorded by one Magistrate and partly by another
  • 327Court to be open
Previous · Section 311APower of Magistrate to order person to give specimen signature or handwritingNext · Section 314Oral arguments and memorandum of arguments