LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
CrPC, 1973
Start Practicing
CrPCChapter XXXSection 395
Section395

Reference to High Court

AI Assist

Summary

When a court finds that disposing a case requires deciding whether an Act, Ordinance or Regulation (or a part of one) is valid, and the court thinks it is invalid though no High Court or Supreme Court has so declared, the court must record its opinion with reasons and refer the question to the High Court. A Court of Session or a Metropolitan Magistrate may also refer any question of law to the High Court even if the first rule does not apply. While the High Court decides, the court may either commit the accused to jail or release them on bail.

Example

Priya is prosecuted under a municipal regulation that bans street vending. The trial court thinks the regulation is invalid and that deciding its validity is necessary to dispose of Priya's case, but the High Court has not ruled on it. The court will state its opinion with reasons and refer the question to the High Court; meanwhile it may commit Priya to jail or release her on bail.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) Where any Court is satisfied that a case pending before it involves a question as to the validity of any Act, Ordinance or Regulation or of any provision contained in an Act, Ordinance or Regulation, the determination of which is necessary for the disposal of the case, and is of opinion that such Act, Ordinance, Regulation or provision is invalid or inoperative, but has not been so declared by the High Court to which that Court is subordinate or by the Supreme Court, the Court shall state a case setting out its opinion and the reasons therefore, and refer the same for the decision of the High Court.

Explanation

– In this section, “Regulation” means any Regulation as defined in the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897), or in the General Clauses Act of a State.

(2) A Court of Session or a Metropolitan Magistrate may, if it or he thinks fit in any case pending before it or him to which the provisions of Sub-Section (1) do not apply, refer for the decision of the High Court any question of law arising in the hearing of such case.

(3) Any Court making a reference to the High Court under Sub-Section (1) or Sub-Section (2) may, pending the decision of the High Court thereon, either commit the accused to jail or release him on bail to appear when called upon.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXX

Chapter XXX

Reference And Revision

In this chapter

  • 395Reference to High Court
  • 396Disposal of case according to decision of High Court
  • 397Calling for records to exercise powers of revision
  • 398Power to order inquiry
  • 399Sessions Judge’s powers of revision
  • 400Power of Additional Sessions Judge
  • 401High Court’s powers of revision
  • 402Power of High Court to withdraw or transfer revision cases
  • 403Option of Court to hear parties
  • 404Statement by Metropolitan Magistrate of grounds of his decision to be considered by High Court
  • 405High Court’s order to be certified to lower Court
Previous · Section 394Abatement of appealsNext · Section 396Disposal of case according to decision of High Court