LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
CrPC, 1973
Start Practicing
CrPCChapter XXXSection 398
Section398

Power to order inquiry

AI Assist

Summary

High Court or a Sessions Judge, while reviewing records, can direct the Chief Judicial Magistrate or any subordinate magistrate to carry out further inquiry into a complaint previously dismissed on preliminary examination or into the case of a person who was discharged. Before ordering inquiry into a discharged person’s case, the court must give that person a chance to show cause against the direction.

Example

Priya files a complaint that the magistrate dismisses on preliminary examination. On review, the Sessions Judge directs the Chief Judicial Magistrate to order further inquiry into Priya’s complaint. The magistrate reopens the matter and conducts the inquiry ordered by the Sessions Judge.

Bare Act

Enacted text

On examining any record under section 397 or otherwise, the High Court or the Sessions Judge may direct the Chief Judicial Magistrate by himself or by any of the Magistrates subordinate to him to make, and the Chief Judicial Magistrate may himself make or direct any subordinate Magistrate to make, further inquiry into any complaint which has been dismissed under section 203 of Sub-Section (4) of section 204 or into the case of any person accused of an offence who has been discharged:

Provided that no Court shall make any direction under this section for inquiry into the case of any person who has been discharged unless such person has had an opportunity of showing cause why such direction should not be made.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXX

Chapter XXX

Reference And Revision

In this chapter

  • 395Reference to High Court
  • 396Disposal of case according to decision of High Court
  • 397Calling for records to exercise powers of revision
  • 398Power to order inquiry
  • 399Sessions Judge’s powers of revision
  • 400Power of Additional Sessions Judge
  • 401High Court’s powers of revision
  • 402Power of High Court to withdraw or transfer revision cases
  • 403Option of Court to hear parties
  • 404Statement by Metropolitan Magistrate of grounds of his decision to be considered by High Court
  • 405High Court’s order to be certified to lower Court
Previous · Section 397Calling for records to exercise powers of revisionNext · Section 399Sessions Judge’s powers of revision