LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
CrPC, 1973
Start Practicing
CrPCChapter XIXSection 243
Section243

Evidence for defence

AI Assist

Summary

Accused is called to begin defence and to produce evidence; any written statement by the accused is filed with the record. If the accused asks the Magistrate to summon witnesses or order production of documents, the Magistrate must issue process unless the request is made for vexation, delay, or to defeat justice and that ground is recorded. If a witness was already cross-examined or had the opportunity earlier, attendance will not be compelled unless necessary for the ends of justice. The Magistrate may require deposit of reasonable expenses before summoning a witness.

Example

Ravi is accused of shop theft and, after entering his defence, asks the Magistrate to summon the shopkeeper Arjun and obtain CCTV footage. The Magistrate issues the summons because the request is not for delay and records the reason. If Arjun had already been cross-examined before Ravi began his defence, the Magistrate could refuse unless his attendance is necessary; reasonable travel costs may be asked up front.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) The accused shall then be called upon to enter upon his defence and produce his evidence; and if the accused puts in any written statement, the Magistrate shall file it with the record.

(2) If the accused, after he had entered upon his defence, applies to the Magistrate to issue any process for compelling the attendance of any witness for the purpose of examination or cross-examination, or the production of any document or other thing, the Magistrate shall issue such process unless he considers that such application should be refused on the ground that it is made for the purpose of vexation or delay or for defeating the ends of justice and such ground shall be recorded by him in writing:

Provided that, when the accused has cross-examined or had the opportunity of cross-examining any witness before entering on his defence, the attendance of such witness shall not be compelled under this section, unless the Magistrate is satisfied that it is necessary for the ends of justice.

(3) The Magistrate may, before summoning any witness on an application under Sub-Section (2), require that the reasonable expenses incurred by the witness in attending for the purposes of the trial be deposited in Court.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XIX

Chapter XIX

Trial Of Warrant-Cases By Magistrates

In this chapter

  • 238Compliance with section 207
  • 239When accused shall be discharged
  • 240Framing of charge
  • 241Conviction on plea of guilty
  • 242Evidence for prosecution
  • 243Evidence for defence
  • 244Evidence for prosecution
  • 245When accused shall be discharged
  • 246Procedure where accused is not discharged
  • 247Evidence for defence
  • 248Acquittal or conviction
  • 249Absence of complainant
  • 250Compensation for accusation without reasonable cause
Previous · Section 242Evidence for prosecutionNext · Section 244Evidence for prosecution