LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
IEA, 1872
Start Practicing
IEAChapter IISection 32
Section32

Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc., is relevant

AI Assist

Summary

Statements made by a person who is dead, missing, or unable to give evidence can be admitted as relevant in certain situations. These include statements about cause of death; entries or memoranda made in the ordinary course of business; statements against the maker’s interest; opinions on public rights or customs; statements about family relationships or in family wills/deeds; and joint statements expressing relevant feelings. Such statements may be used even if the maker was not expecting death.

Example

Meera is found fatally injured after an assault. Before she died she told a neighbour that Karan attacked her and that the blow caused her injuries. Meera’s statement about the cause of her death is relevant evidence and can be admitted even though she did not state it expecting death.

Bare Act

Enacted text

Statements, written or verbal, of relevant facts made by a person who is dead, or who cannot be found, or who has become incapable of giving evidence, or whose attendance cannot be procured, without an amount of delay or expense which under the circumstances of the case appears to the Court unreasonable, are themselves relevant facts in the following cases—

(1) when it relates to cause of death: When the statement is made by a person as to the cause of his death, or as to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death, in cases in which the cause of that person’s death comes into question.
Such statements are relevant whether the person who made them was or was not, at the time when they were made, under expectation of death, and whatever may be the nature of the proceeding in which the cause of his death comes into question.

(2) or is made in course of business: When the statement was made by such person in the ordinary course of business, and in particular when it consists of any entry or memorandum made by him in books kept in the ordinary course of business, or in the discharge of professional duly; or of an acknowledgment written or signed by him of the receipt of money, goods, securities or property of any kind; or of a document used in commerce written or signed by him; or of the date of a letter or other document usually dated, written or signed by him.

(3) or against interest of maker: When the statement is against the pecuniary or proprietary interest of the person making it or when, if true, it would expose him or would have exposed him to a criminal prosecution or to a suit for damages.

(4) or gives opinion as to public right or custom, or matters of general interests: When the statement gives the opinion of any such person, as to the existence of any public right or custom or matter of public or general interest, of the existence of which, if it existed he would have been likely to be aware, and when such statement was made before any controversy as to such right, custom or matter had arisen.

(5) or relates to existence of relationship: When the statement relates to the existence of any relationship by blood, marriage or adoption between persons as to whose relationship by blood, marriage or adoption the person making the statement had special means of knowledge, and when the statement was made before the question in dispute was raised.

(6) or is made in will or deed relating to family affairs: When the statement relates to the existence of any relationship by blood, marriage or adoption between persons deceased, and is made in any will or deed relating to the affairs of the family to which any such deceased person belonged, or in any family pedigree, or upon any tombstone, family portrait, or other thing on which such statements are usually made, and when such statement was made before the question in dispute was raised.

(7) or is document relating to transaction mentioned in section 13, clause (a): When the statement is contained in any deed, will or other document which relates to any such transaction as is mentioned in section 13, clause (a).

(8) or is made by several persons and expresses feelings relevant to matter in question: When the statement was made by a number of persons, and expressed feelings or impressions on their pan relevant to the matter in question.

Illustrations

  • (a) The question is, whether A was murdered by B; or
    A dies of injuries received in a transaction in the course of which she was ravished. The question is whether she was ravished by B; or
    The question is, whether A was killed by B under such circumstances that a suit would lie against B by A’s widow.
    Statements made by A as to the cause of his or her death, referring respectively to the murder, the rape and the actionable wrong under consideration, are relevant facts.

(b) The question is as to the date of A’s birth.
An entry in the diary of a deceased surgeon regularly kept in the course of business, stating that, on a given day he attended A’s mother and delivered her of a son, is a relevant fact.

(c) The question is, whether A was in Calcutta on a given day.
A statement in the diary of a deceased solicitor, regularly kept in the course of business that on a given day the solicitor attended A at a place mentioned, in Calcutta, for the purpose of conferring with him upon specified business, is a relevant fact.

(d) The question is, whether a ship sailed from Bombay harbour on a given day.
A letter written by a deceased member of a merchants firm, by which she was chartered to their correspondents in London to whom the cargo was consigned, stating that me ship sailed on a given day from Bombay harbour, is a relevant fact.

(e) The question is, whether rent was paid to A for certain land.
A letter from A’s deceased agent to A, saying that he had received the rent on A’s account and held it at A’s orders is a relevant fact.

(f) The question is, whether A and B were legally married.
The statement of a deceased clergyman that he married them under such circumstances that the celebration would be a crime, is relevant.

(g) The question is, whether A, a person who cannot be found, wrote a letter on a certain day. The fact that a letter written by him is dated on that day is relevant.

(h) The question is, what was the cause of the wreck of a ship.
A protest made by the Captain, whose attendance cannot be procured, is a relevant fact.

(i) The question is, whether a given road is a public way.
A statement by A, a deceased headman of the village, that the road was public, is a relevant fact.

(j) The question is, what was the price of grain on a certain day in a particular market. A statement of the price, made by a deceased banya in the ordinary course of his business is a relevant fact.

(k) The question is, whether A, who is dead, was the father of B.
A statement by A that B was his son, is a relevant fact.

(l) The question is, what was the date of the birth of A.
A letter from A’s deceased father to a friend, announcing the birth of A on a given day, is a relevant fact.

(m) The question is, whether, and when, A and B were married.
An entry in a memorandum book by C, the deceased father of B, of his daughter’s marriage with A on a given date, is a relevant fact.

(n) A sues B for a libel expressed in a painted caricature exposed in a shop window. The question is as to the similarity of the caricature and its libellous character. The remarks of a crowd of spectators on these points may be proved.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

II

Chapter II

Of the Relevancy of Facts

In this chapter

  • 5Evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant facts
  • 6Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction
  • 7Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue
  • 8Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct
  • 9Facts necessary to explain or introduce relevant facts
  • 10Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common design
  • 11When facts not otherwise relevant become relevant
  • 12In suits for damages, facts tending to enable Court to determine amount are relevant
  • 13Facts relevant when right or custom is in question
  • 14Facts showing existence of state of mind, or of body or bodily feeling
  • 15Facts bearing on question whether act was accidental or intentional
  • 16Existence of course of business when relevant
  • 17Admission defined
  • 18Admission by party to proceeding or his agent by suitor in representative character
  • 19Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit
  • 20Admissions by persons expressly referred to by party to suit
  • 21Proof of admissions against persons making them, and by or on their behalf
  • 22When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant
  • 22AWhen oral admission as to contents of electronic records are relevant
  • 23Admissions in civil cases, when relevant
  • 24Confession caused by inducement, threat or promise, when irrelevant in criminal proceeding
  • 25Confession to police officer not to be proved
  • 26Confession by accused while in custody of police not to be proved against him
  • 27How much of information received from accused may be proved
  • 28Confession made after removal of impression caused by inducement, threat or promise relevant
  • 29Confession otherwise relevant not to become irrelevant because of promise of secrecy, etc
  • 30Consideration of proved confession affecting person making it and others jointly under trial for same offence
  • 31Admissions not conclusive proof, but may estop
  • 32Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc., is relevant
  • 33Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, the truth of facts therein stated
  • 34Entries in books of account including those maintained in an electronic form when relevant
  • 35Relevancy of entry in public record or an electronic record made in performance of duty
  • 36Relevancy of statements in maps, charts and plans
  • 37Relevancy of statement as to fact to public nature, contained in certain Acts or notifications
  • 38Relevancy of statements as to any law contained in law-books
  • 39What evidence to be given when statement forms part of a conversation, document, electronic record, book or series of letters or papers
  • 40Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial
  • 41Relevancy of certain judgments in probate, etc., jurisdiction
  • 42Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 41
  • 43Judgments, etc., other than those mentioned in sections 40 to 42, when relevant
  • 44Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be proved
  • 45Opinions of experts
  • 46Facts bearing upon opinions of experts
  • 47Opinion as to handwriting, when relevant
  • 47AOpinion as to digital signature when relevant
  • 48Opinion as to existence of right or custom, when relevant
  • 49Opinion as to usages, tenets, etc., when relevant
  • 50Opinion or relationship, when relevant
  • 51Grounds of opinion, when relevant
  • 52In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant
  • 53In criminal cases, previous good character relevant
  • 53AEvidence of character or previous sexual experience not relevant in certain cases. 1
  • 54Previous bad character not relevant, except in reply
  • 55Character as affecting damages
Previous · Section 31Admissions not conclusive proof, but may estopNext · Section 33Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, the truth of facts therein stated