LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BNSS, 2023
Start Practicing
BNSSChapter XXIXSection 403
Section403

Court not to alter judgment

AI Assist

Summary

Once a court has signed its judgment or final order disposing of a case, it cannot alter or review that decision except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. This bar applies unless some other provision in this Sanhita or any law allows a change. The court may therefore make only minor corrections, not reopen or change the substance of the decision.

Example

Priya sues her neighbour for property damage and the court signs a final order awarding ₹50,000. Later the judge spots a typing mistake that records the award as ₹5,000. Under this rule the court may correct the clerical/arithmetic error to show ₹50,000, but it cannot reopen the case or change the substantive judgment.

Bare Act

Enacted text

Save as otherwise provided by this Sanhita or by any other law for the time being in force, no Court, when it has signed its judgment or final order disposing of a case, shall alter or review the same except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXIX

Chapter XXIX

The Judgment

In this chapter

  • 392Judgment
  • 393Language and contents of judgment
  • 394Order for notifying address of previously convicted offender
  • 395Order to pay compensation
  • 396Victim Compensation scheme
  • 397Treatment of victims
  • 398Witness protection scheme
  • 399Compensation to persons groundlessly arrested
  • 400Order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases
  • 401Order to release on probation of good conduct or after admonition
  • 402Special reasons to be recorded in certain cases
  • 403Court not to alter judgment
  • 404Copy of judgment to be given to accused and other persons
  • 405Judgment when to be translated
  • 406Court of Session to send copy of finding and sentence to District Magistrate
Previous · Section 402Special reasons to be recorded in certain casesNext · Section 404Copy of judgment to be given to accused and other persons