LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BNSS, 2023
Start Practicing
BNSSChapter XXIXSection 392
Section392

Judgment

AI Assist

Summary

Judgment in every trial before a Criminal Court of original jurisdiction must be pronounced in open court immediately after trial or within 45 days, with notice to the parties or their advocates. The court may deliver the full judgment, read it out, or read the operative part and explain it in a language the accused or advocate understands. If the accused is in custody they must be produced in person or by audio-video, and absence of a party does not alone invalidate the judgment; the court may proceed to avoid delay.

Example

Rohan is tried for a minor assault. After the trial the magistrate reads out the operative part of the judgment and explains it in Hindi, and Rohan, who is in custody, is produced by video to hear it. The court gives him a free copy and proceeds even though a co-accused failed to attend.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) The judgment in every trial in any Criminal Court of original jurisdiction shall be pronounced in open Court by the presiding officer immediately after the termination of the trial or at some subsequent time not later than forty-five days of which notice shall be given to the parties or their advocates,-

  • (a) by delivering the whole of the judgment; or

  • (b) by reading out the whole of the judgment; or

  • (c) by reading out the operative part of the judgment and explaining the substance of the judgment in a language which is understood by the accused or his advocate.

(2) Where the judgment is delivered under clause (a) of sub-section (1), the presiding officer shall cause it to be taken down in short-hand, sign the transcript and every page thereof as soon as it is made ready, and write on it the date of the delivery of the judgment in open Court.

(3) Where the judgment or the operative part thereof is read out under clause (b) or clause (c) of sub-section (1), as the case may be, it shall be dated and signed by the presiding officer in open Court, and if it is not written with his own hand, every page of the judgment shall be signed by him.

(4) Where the judgment is pronounced in the manner specified in clause (c) of sub-section (1), the whole judgment or a copy thereof shall be immediately made available for the perusal of the parties or their advocates free of cost:

Provided that the Court shall, as far as practicable, upload the copy of the judgment on its portal within a period of seven days from the date of judgment.

(5) If the accused is in custody, he shall be brought up to hear the judgment pronounced either in person or through audio-video electronic means.

(6) If the accused is not in custody, he shall be required by the Court to attend to hear the judgment pronounced, except where his personal attendance during the trial has been dispensed with and the sentence is one of fine only or he is acquitted:

Provided that where there are more accused persons than one, and one or more of them do not attend the Court on the date on which the judgment is to be pronounced, the presiding officer may, in order to avoid undue delay in the disposal of the case, pronounce the judgment notwithstanding their absence.

(7) No judgment delivered by any Criminal Court shall be deemed to be invalid by reason only of the absence of any party or his advocate on the day or from the place notified for the delivery thereof, or of any omission to serve, or defect in serving, on the parties or their advocates, or any of them, the notice of such day and place.

(8) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit in any way the extent of the provisions of section 511.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXIX

Chapter XXIX

The Judgment

In this chapter

  • 392Judgment
  • 393Language and contents of judgment
  • 394Order for notifying address of previously convicted offender
  • 395Order to pay compensation
  • 396Victim Compensation scheme
  • 397Treatment of victims
  • 398Witness protection scheme
  • 399Compensation to persons groundlessly arrested
  • 400Order to pay costs in non-cognizable cases
  • 401Order to release on probation of good conduct or after admonition
  • 402Special reasons to be recorded in certain cases
  • 403Court not to alter judgment
  • 404Copy of judgment to be given to accused and other persons
  • 405Judgment when to be translated
  • 406Court of Session to send copy of finding and sentence to District Magistrate
Previous · Section 391Certain Judges and Magistrates not to try certain offences when committed before themselvesNext · Section 393Language and contents of judgment