LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BSA, 2023
Start Practicing
BSAChapter IISection 27
Section27

Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, truth of facts therein stated

AI Assist

Summary

Prior testimony given by a witness in a judicial proceeding can be used later to prove the truth of facts stated if the witness is dead, cannot be found, is incapable of giving evidence, is kept away by the adverse party, or cannot be produced without unreasonable delay or expense. The earlier proceeding must have been between the same parties or their representatives, the adverse party must have had the right and opportunity to cross-examine, and the questions in issue must be substantially the same. A criminal trial or inquiry counts as between the prosecutor and the accused.

Example

Ravi testified in a civil suit that a tenant owed him unpaid rent. Years later Ravi dies and the landlord files a new suit against the same tenant over the same unpaid rent. Because the tenant had the earlier opportunity to cross-examine Ravi and the parties are the same, the court can admit Ravi’s prior testimony to prove the rent debt.

Bare Act

Enacted text

Evidence given by a witness in a judicial proceeding, or before any person authorised by law to take it, is relevant for the purpose of proving, in a subsequent judicial proceeding, or in a later stage of the same judicial proceeding, the truth of the facts which it states, when the witness is dead or cannot be found, or is incapable of giving evidence, or is kept out of the way by the adverse party, or if his presence cannot be obtained without an amount of delay or expense which, under the circumstances of the case, the Court considers unreasonable:

Provided that the proceeding was between the same parties or their representatives in interest; that the adverse party in the first proceeding had the right and opportunity to cross-examine and the questions in issue were substantially the same in the first as in the second proceeding.

Explanation.-A criminal trial or inquiry shall be deemed to be a proceeding between the prosecutor and the accused within the meaning of this section. Statements made under special circumstances

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

II

Chapter II

Relevancy of Facts

In this chapter

  • 3Evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant facts
  • 4Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction
  • 5Facts which are occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue or relevant facts
  • 6Motive, Preparation and previous or subsequent conduct
  • 7Facts necessary to explain or introduce fact in issue or relevant facts
  • 8Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common design
  • 9When facts not otherwise relevant become relevant
  • 10Facts tending to enable Court to determine amount are relevant in suits for damages
  • 11Facts relevant when right or custom is in question
  • 12Facts showing existence of state of mind, or of body or bodily feeling
  • 13Facts bearing on question whether act was accidental or intentional
  • 14Existence of course of business when relevant
  • 15Admission defined
  • 16Admission by party to proceeding or his agent
  • 17Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit
  • 18Admissions by persons expressly referred to by party to suit
  • 19Proof of admissions against persons making them, and by or on their behalf
  • 20When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant
  • 21Admissions in civil cases when relevant
  • 22Confession caused by inducement, threat, coercion or promise, when irrelevant in criminal proceeding
  • 23Confession to police officer
  • 24Consideration of proved confession affecting person making it and others jointly under trial for same offence
  • 25Admissions not conclusive proof, but may estop
  • 26Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc., is relevant
  • 27Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, truth of facts therein stated
  • 28Entries in books of account when relevant
  • 29Relevancy of entry in public record or an electronic record made in performance of duty
  • 30Relevancy of statements in maps, charts and plans
  • 31Relevancy of statement as to fact of public nature contained in certain Acts or notifications
  • 32Relevancy of statements as to any law contained in law books including electronic or digital form
  • 33What evidence to be given when statement forms part of a conversation, document, electronic record, book or series of letters or papers
  • 34Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial
  • 35Relevancy of certain judgments in probate, etc., jurisdiction
  • 36Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 35
  • 37Judgments, etc., other than those mentioned in sections 34, 35 and 36 when relevant
  • 38Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be proved
  • 39Opinions of experts
  • 40Facts bearing upon opinions of experts
  • 41Opinion as to handwriting and signature, when relevant
  • 42Opinion as to existence of general custom or right, when relevant
  • 43Opinion as to usages, tenets, etc., when relevant
  • 44Opinion on relationship, when relevant
  • 45Grounds of opinion, when relevant
  • 46In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant
  • 47In criminal cases previous good character relevant
  • 48Evidence of character or previous sexual experience not relevant in certain cases
  • 49Previous bad character not relevant, except in reply
  • 50Character as Affecting damages
Previous · Section 26Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc., is relevantNext · Section 28Entries in books of account when relevant