Grounds of opinion, when relevant
AI Assist
Summary
If a living person's opinion is relevant, the facts, observations or tests that form the basis of that opinion are also admissible. This applies not just to experts but to any witness whose opinion matters. The consequence is the court can examine the underlying grounds (experiments, data, observations) along with the opinion itself.
Example
Meera, a forensic analyst, testifies that a paint sample matches a suspect's car. Under this rule she must also describe the experiments, tests and observations she relied on to form that opinion. The court will consider both her conclusion and the underlying results.
Bare Act
Enacted textWhenever the opinion of any living person is relevant, the grounds on which such opinion is based are also relevant.
Illustration.
An expert may give an account of experiments performed by him for the purpose of forming his opinion.
Previous year papers
Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.