LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BNSS, 2023
Start Practicing
BNSSChapter XXVIIISection 383
Section383

Summary procedure for trial for giving false evidence

AI Assist

Summary

When a Court of Session or a Magistrate of the first class, while delivering a judgment or final order, forms the opinion that a witness knowingly gave or fabricated evidence to be used in that proceeding, the court may take cognizance and summarily try the witness after giving a reasonable opportunity to show cause. The court may sentence the witness to up to three months imprisonment, or to a fine up to one thousand rupees, or both, following summary-trial procedure. The court may instead prefer a complaint under section 379, and if an appeal or revision is filed against the judgment the summary trial must be stayed until that appeal or revision is disposed.

Example

Rohan testified in a theft case and, at the judgment hearing, the Magistrate believed Rohan had knowingly lied to help one party. The Magistrate gave Rohan a chance to explain and summarily tried him under this provision. Rohan could be sentenced to up to three months imprisonment, or fined up to one thousand rupees, or both.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) If, at the time of delivery of any judgment or final order disposing of any judicial proceeding, a Court of Session or Magistrate of the first class expresses an opinion to the effect that any witness appearing in such proceeding had knowingly or wilfully given false evidence or had fabricated false evidence with the intention that such evidence should be used in such proceeding, it or he may, if satisfied that it is necessary and expedient in the interest of justice that the witness should be tried summarily for giving or fabricating, as the case may be, false evidence, take cognizance of the offence and may, after giving the offender a reasonable opportunity of showing cause why he should not be punished for such offence, try such offender summarily and sentence him to imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months, or to fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.

(2) In every such case the Court shall follow, as nearly as may be practicable, the procedure prescribed for summary trials.

(3) Nothing in this section shall affect the power of the Court to make a complaint under section 379 for the offence, where it does not choose to proceed under this section.

(4) Where, after any action is initiated under sub-section (1), it is made to appear to the Court of Session or Magistrate of the first class that an appeal or an application for revision has been preferred or filed against the judgment or order in which the opinion referred to in that sub-section has been expressed, it or he shall stay further proceedings of the trial until the disposal of the appeal or the application for revision, as the case may be, and thereupon the further proceedings of the trial shall abide by the results of the appeal or application for revision.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXVIII

Chapter XXVIII

Provisions as to Offences Affecting The Administration of Justice

In this chapter

  • 379Procedure in cases mentioned in section 215
  • 380Appeal
  • 381Power to order costs
  • 382Procedure of Magistrate taking cognizance
  • 383Summary procedure for trial for giving false evidence
  • 384Procedure in certain cases of contempt
  • 385Procedure where Court considers that case should not be dealt with under section 384
  • 386When Registrar or Sub-Registrar to be deemed a Civil Court
  • 387Discharge of offender on submission of apology
  • 388Imprisonment or committal of person refusing to answer or produce document
  • 389Summary procedure for punishment for nonattendance by a witness in obedience to summons
  • 390Appeals from convictions under sections 383, 384, 388 and 389
  • 391Certain Judges and Magistrates not to try certain offences when committed before themselves
Previous · Section 382Procedure of Magistrate taking cognizanceNext · Section 384Procedure in certain cases of contempt