LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
IEA, 1872
Start Practicing
IEAChapter VSection 63
Section63

Secondary evidence

AI Assist

Summary

When the original document cannot be produced, certain substitutes are admissible as secondary evidence. These include certified copies, mechanically produced copies (for example photographs or machine-made copies), copies made from or compared with the original, counterparts against non-signing parties, and oral accounts by someone who has seen the original. An oral description of a copy, photograph or machine copy does not itself prove the original.

Example

Priya cannot find the original lease, so she files a certified photocopy in court and calls Arjun who says he saw the original. The court can accept the certified copy and Arjun's oral account as secondary evidence of the lease. If Arjun only describes a photocopy, his testimony would not prove the original.

Bare Act

Enacted text

Secondary evidence means and includes—

(1) Certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter contained1;

(2) Copies made from the original by mechanical processes which in themselves insure the accuracy of the copy, and copies compared with such copies;

(3) Copies made from or compared with the original;

(4) Counterparts of documents as against the parties who did not execute them;

(5) Oral accounts of the contents of a document given by some person who has himself seen it.

Illustrations

  • (a) A photograph of an original is secondary evidence of its contents, though the two have not been compared, if it is proved that the thing photographed was the original.

  • (b) A copy compared with a copy of a letter made by a copying machine is secondary evidence of the contents of the letter if it is shown that the copy made by the copying machine was made from the original.

  • (c) A copy transcribed from a copy, but afterwards compared with the original, is secondary evidence; but the copy not so compared is not secondary evidence of the original, although the copy from which it was transcribed was compared with the original.

  • (d) Neither art oral account of a copy compared with the original, nor an oral account of a photograph or machine copy of the original, is secondary evidence of the original.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

V

Chapter V

Of Documentary Evidence

In this chapter

  • 61Proof of contents of documents
  • 62Primary evidence
  • 63Secondary evidence
  • 64Proof of documents by primary evidence
  • 65Cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given
  • 65ASpecial provisions as to evidence relating to electronic record
  • 65BAdmissibility of electronic records
  • 66Rules as to notice to produce
  • 67Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document produced
  • 67AProof as to digital signature
  • 68Proof of execution of document required by law to be attested
  • 69Proof where no attesting witness found
  • 70Admission of execution by party to attested document
  • 71Proof when attesting witness denies the execution
  • 72Proof of document not required by law to be attested
  • 73Comparison of signature, writing or seal with others admitted or proved
  • 73AProof as to verification of digital signature
  • 74Public documents
  • 75Private documents
  • 76Certified copies of public documents
  • 77Proof of documents by production of certified copies
  • 78Proof of other official documents
  • 79Presumption as to genuineness of certified copies
  • 80Presumption as to documents produced as record of evidence
  • 81Presumption as to Gazettes, newspapers, private Acts of Parliament and other documents
  • 81APresumption as to Gazettes in electronic forms
  • 82Presumption as to document admissible in England without proof of seal or signature
  • 83Presumption as to maps or plans made by authority of Government
  • 84Presumption as to collections of laws and reports of decisions
  • 85Presumption as to power-of-attorney
  • 85APresumption as to electronic agreements
  • 87Presumption as to books, maps and charts
  • 88Presumption as to telegraphic messages
  • 88APresumption as to electronic messages
  • 89Presumption as to due execution, etc. of documents not produced
  • 90Presumption as to documents thirty years old
  • 90APresumption as to electronic records five years old
Previous · Section 62Primary evidenceNext · Section 64Proof of documents by primary evidence