LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
CrPC, 1973
Start Practicing
CrPCChapter XXIIISection 276
Section276

Record in trial before Court of Session

AI Assist

Summary

In a Sessions Court trial each witness's evidence must be written down as the examination proceeds, either by the presiding Judge, by his open‑court dictation, or under his direction by a court officer. The statement is usually taken as a narrative, but the Judge may record any part in question-and-answer form. The written evidence must be signed by the presiding Judge and becomes part of the record.

Example

Rohan is testifying in a Sessions Court theft trial. As he answers, the presiding Judge or an officer under the Judge’s direction writes his evidence in narrative form. The presiding Judge signs that written record and it becomes part of the official case record. If the Judge had preferred, some answers could instead have been recorded as question and answer.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) In all trials before a Court of Session, the evidence of each witness shall, as his examination proceeds, be taken down in writing either by the presiding Judge himself or by his dictation in open Court or under his direction and superintendence, by an officer of the Court appointed by him in this behalf.

(2) Such evidence shall ordinarily be taken down in the form of a narrative, but the presiding Judge may, in his discretion take down or cause to be taken down, any part of such evidence in the form of question and answer.

(3) The evidence so taken down shall be signed by the presiding Judge and shall form part of the record.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXIII

Chapter XXIII

Evidence In Inquiries And Trials

In this chapter

  • 272Language of Courts
  • 273Evidence to be taken in presence of accused
  • 274Record in summons-cases and inquiries
  • 275Record in warrant-cases
  • 276Record in trial before Court of Session
  • 277Language of record of evidence
  • 278Procedure in regard to such evidence when completed
  • 279Interpretation of evidence to accused or his pleader
  • 280Remarks respecting demeanour of witness
  • 281Record of examination of accused
  • 282Interpreter to be bound to interpret truthfully
  • 283Record in High Court
  • 284When attendance of witness may be dispensed with and commission issued
  • 285Commission to whom to be issued
  • 286Execution of commissions
  • 287Parties may examine witnesses
  • 288Return of commission
  • 289Adjournment of proceeding
  • 290Execution of foreign commissions
  • 291Deposition of medical witness
  • 291AIdentification report of Magistrate
  • 292Evidence of officers of the Mint
  • 293Reports of certain Government scientific experts
  • 294No formal proof of certain documents
  • 295Affidavit in proof of conduct of public servants
  • 296Evidence of formal character on affidavit
  • 297Authorities before whom affidavits may be sworn
  • 298Previous conviction of acquittal how proved
  • 299Record of evidence in absence of accused
Previous · Section 275Record in warrant-casesNext · Section 277Language of record of evidence