LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
CrPC, 1973
Start Practicing
CrPCChapter XXIIISection 293
Section293

Reports of certain Government scientific experts

AI Assist

Summary

Reports signed by specified Government scientific experts on material sent to them in criminal proceedings are admissible as evidence. The court may summon the expert to give evidence, and if the expert cannot attend it can permit a responsible colleague to appear unless personal attendance is expressly required. The rule covers designated government forensic posts and any others notified by the Central Government.

Example

Priya gives a blood-stained cloth from a theft scene to police, who send it to the Government serologist. The serologist’s signed report is produced at trial and admitted as evidence. The court summons the expert, but when she cannot attend the lab’s responsible officer appears and testifies on her behalf because personal attendance was not ordered.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) Any document purporting to be a report under the hand of a Government scientific expert to whom this section applies, upon any matter or thing duly submitted to him for examination or analysis and report in the course of any proceeding under this Code, may be used as evidence in any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code.

(2) The Court may, if it thinks fit, summon and examine any such expert as to the subject-matter of his report.

(3) Where any such expert is summoned by a Court and he is unable to attend personally, he may unless the Court has expressly directed him to appear personally, depute any responsible officer working with him to attend the Court, if such officer is conversant with the facts of the case and can satisfactorily depose in Court on his behalf.

(4) This section applies to the following Government scientific experts, namely:-

  • (a) any Chemical Examiner or Assistant Chemical Examiner to Government;

  • (b) the Chief Inspector of Explosives;

  • (c) the Director of the Finger Print Bureau;

  • (d) the Director, Haffkeine Institute, Bombay;

  • (e) the Director 1 [Deputy Director or Assistant Director of a Central Forensic Science Laboratory or a State forensic Science Laboratory;

  • (f) the Serologist to the Government.

  • (g) any other Government scientific Expert specified by notification by the Central Government for this purpose.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXIII

Chapter XXIII

Evidence In Inquiries And Trials

In this chapter

  • 272Language of Courts
  • 273Evidence to be taken in presence of accused
  • 274Record in summons-cases and inquiries
  • 275Record in warrant-cases
  • 276Record in trial before Court of Session
  • 277Language of record of evidence
  • 278Procedure in regard to such evidence when completed
  • 279Interpretation of evidence to accused or his pleader
  • 280Remarks respecting demeanour of witness
  • 281Record of examination of accused
  • 282Interpreter to be bound to interpret truthfully
  • 283Record in High Court
  • 284When attendance of witness may be dispensed with and commission issued
  • 285Commission to whom to be issued
  • 286Execution of commissions
  • 287Parties may examine witnesses
  • 288Return of commission
  • 289Adjournment of proceeding
  • 290Execution of foreign commissions
  • 291Deposition of medical witness
  • 291AIdentification report of Magistrate
  • 292Evidence of officers of the Mint
  • 293Reports of certain Government scientific experts
  • 294No formal proof of certain documents
  • 295Affidavit in proof of conduct of public servants
  • 296Evidence of formal character on affidavit
  • 297Authorities before whom affidavits may be sworn
  • 298Previous conviction of acquittal how proved
  • 299Record of evidence in absence of accused
Previous · Section 292Evidence of officers of the MintNext · Section 294No formal proof of certain documents