LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BSA, 2023
Start Practicing
BSAChapter VSection 92
Section92

Presumption as to documents thirty years old

AI Assist

Summary

When a document is thirty years old and is produced from custody the court considers proper, the court may presume that the handwriting and signatures on it are genuine and that, if the document is executed or attested, it was duly executed and attested. The presumption covers every part purporting to be in a particular person’s handwriting. Proper custody includes long possession, mortgagee custody with the mortgagor in possession, or safe deposit.

Example

Ravi has possessed a plot of land for many years and produces old title deeds taken from a locked chest in his house. Because the deeds are over thirty years old and came from his custody, the court may presume the signatures and handwriting are Ravi’s and that the deeds were properly executed and attested, unless contradictory evidence is proved.

Bare Act

Enacted text

Where any document, purporting or proved to be thirty years old, is produced from any custody which the Court in the particular case considers proper, the Court may presume that the signature and every other part of such document, which purports to be in the handwriting of any particular person, is in that person's handwriting, and, in the case of a document executed or attested, that it was duly executed and attested by the persons by whom it purports to be executed and attested.

Explanation.-The Explanation to section 80 shall also apply to this section.

Illustrations.

  • (a) A has been in possession of landed property for a long time. He produces from his custody deeds relating to the land showing his titles to it. The custody shall be proper.

  • (b) A produces deeds relating to landed property of which he is the mortgagee. The mortgagor is in possession. The custody shall be proper.

  • (c) A, a connection of B, produces deeds relating to lands in B's possession, which were deposited with him by B for safe custody. The custody shall be proper.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

V

Chapter V

Of Documentary Evidence

In this chapter

  • 56Proof of contents of documents
  • 57Primary Evidence
  • 58Secondary Evidence
  • 59Proof of documents by primary evidence
  • 60Cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given
  • 61Electronic or digital record
  • 62Special provisions as to evidence relating to electronic record
  • 63Admissibility of electronic records
  • 64Rules as to notice to produce
  • 65Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document produced
  • 66Proof as to Electronic signature
  • 67Proof of execution of document required by law to be attested
  • 68Proof where no attesting witness found
  • 69Admission of execution by party to attested document
  • 70Proof when Attesting witness denies execution
  • 71Proof of document not required by law to be attested
  • 72Comparison of signature, writing or seal with others admitted or proved
  • 73Proof as to verification of digital signature
  • 74Public and private documents
  • 75Certified copies of public documents
  • 76Proof of documents by production of certified copies
  • 77Proof of other official documents
  • 78Presumption as to genuineness of certified copies
  • 79Presumption as to documents produced as record of evidence, etc
  • 80Presumption as to Gazettes, newspapers, and other documents
  • 81Presumption as to Gazettes in electronic or digital record
  • 82Presumption as to maps or plans made by authority of Government
  • 83Presumption as to collections of laws and reports of decisions
  • 84Presumption as to powersof-attorney
  • 85Presumption as to electronic agreements
  • 86Presumption as to electronic records and electronic signatures
  • 87Presumption as to Electronic Signature Certificates
  • 88Presumption as to certified copies of foreign judicial records
  • 89Presumption as to books, maps and charts
  • 90Presumption as to electronic messages
  • 91Presumption as to due execution, etc., of documents not produced
  • 92Presumption as to documents thirty years old
  • 93Presumption as to electronic records five years old
Previous · Section 91Presumption as to due execution, etc., of documents not producedNext · Section 93Presumption as to electronic records five years old