LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BNSS, 2023
Start Practicing
BNSSChapter XXVSection 330
Section330

No formal proof of certain documents

AI Assist

Summary

When the prosecution or the accused files documents in court, every document must be listed and the party (or their advocate) must admit or deny each document's genuineness soon after supply and in any case within 30 days. The court may extend that time with reasons in writing, and experts are not summoned unless their report is disputed. If genuineness is not disputed, the document can be read in evidence without proving the signature, though the court may still ask for proof.

Example

Priya files bank statements in court as prosecution evidence and supplies copies to the defence. The defence must admit or deny the statements' genuineness within 30 days; the court may extend the time with reasons. The defence does not dispute the signatures, so the judge reads the statements in evidence without separate proof of signature.

Bare Act

Enacted text

(1) Where any document is filed before any Court by the prosecution or the accused, the particulars of every such document shall be included in a list and the prosecution or the accused or the advocate for the prosecution or the accused, if any, shall be called upon to admit or deny the genuineness of each such document soon after supply of such documents and in no case later than thirty days after such supply:

Provided that the Court may, in its discretion, relax the time limit with reasons to be recorded in writing:

Provided further that no expert shall be called to appear before the Court unless the report of such expert is disputed by any of the parties to the trial.

(2) The list of documents shall be in such form as the State Government may, by rules, provide.

(3) Where the genuineness of any document is not disputed, such document may be read in evidence in any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Sanhita without proof of the signature of the person by whom it purports to be signed:

Provided that the Court may, in its discretion, require such signature to be proved.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXV

Chapter XXV

Evidence in Inquiries and Trials

In this chapter

  • 307Language of Courts
  • 308Evidence to be taken in presence of accused
  • 309Record in summonscases and inquiries
  • 310Record in warrant-cases
  • 311Record in trial before Court of Session
  • 312Language of record of evidence
  • 313Procedure in regard to such evidence when completed
  • 314Interpretation of evidence to accused or his advocate
  • 315Remarks Respecting demeanour of witness
  • 316Record of Examination of accused
  • 317Interpreter to be bound to interpret truthfully
  • 318Record in High Court
  • 319When attendance of witness may be dispensed with and commission issued
  • 320Commission to whom to be issued
  • 321Execution of commissions
  • 322Parties may examine witnesses
  • 323Return of commission
  • 324Adjournment of proceeding
  • 325Execution of Foreign commissions
  • 326Deposition of Medical witness
  • 327Identification report of Magistrate
  • 328Evidence of officers of Mint
  • 329Reports of Certain Government Scientific experts
  • 330No formal proof of certain documents
  • 331Affidavit in proof of conduct of public servants
  • 332Evidence of formal character on affidavit
  • 333Authorities before whom affidavits may be sworn
  • 334Previous conviction or acquittal how proved
  • 335Record of evidence in absence of accused
  • 336Evidence of public servants, experts, police officers in certain cases
Previous · Section 329Reports of Certain Government Scientific expertsNext · Section 331Affidavit in proof of conduct of public servants