LawpatraLawpatra.ai

Lawpatra is an AI-powered legal education platform designed to help aspirants crack premier law entrance and judiciary examinations. With adaptive mock tests, precision analytics, and 24/7 personalized AI tutoring, we provide a comprehensive ecosystem for your entire legal career journey.

Test series on the goGoogle Play

Explore

  • Prepare for our exams
  • Bare Acts
  • Blog
  • Download resources

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact us

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Account deletion

Product

  • AI Tutor
  • Features
  • How it works

Law Entrances

  • CLAT
  • CLAT PG
  • AILET
  • SLAT
  • MH CET Law

Judiciary

  • MPSC Civil Judge
  • Chhattisgarh Judiciary
  • OPSC Civil Judge
  • Gujarat Judiciary
  • Delhi Judicial Services
  • UP PCS-J
  • Rajasthan Judiciary Service

APO/ADPO

  • Bihar APO
  • Delhi APP
  • Haryana ADA
  • Madhya Pradesh ADPO
  • Rajasthan APO
  • Uttar Pradesh APO
  • Uttarakhand APO

Bare Acts

  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • BSA
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • IEA
  • HMA
  • IDA
  • MVA

© 2026 Blingwork Technologies Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

Offices: Hyderabad & Jodhpur

LawpatraLawpatra
BNSS, 2023
Start Practicing
BNSSChapter XXVSection 334
Section334

Previous conviction or acquittal how proved

AI Assist

Summary

A past conviction or acquittal can be proved, in addition to other legal methods, by a certified extract from the court records, or (for convictions) by a jail officer's certificate or the warrant of commitment. In each case the identity of the accused must also be proved to match the person named in that record. These are admissible modes of proof in any inquiry, trial or proceeding under this Sanhita.

Example

Priya is facing a trial for shop theft. The prosecutor produces a court-certified extract showing Priya's earlier conviction and brings neighbours to confirm it is the same Priya. The court accepts the extract together with the identity evidence as proof of the previous conviction.

Bare Act

Enacted text

In any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Sanhita, a previous conviction or acquittal may be proved, in addition to any other mode provided by any law for the time being in force,-

  • (a) by an extract certified under the hand of the officer having the custody of the records of the Court in which such conviction or acquittal was held, to be a copy of the sentence or order; or

  • (b) in case of a conviction, either by a certificate signed by the officer in charge of the jail in which the punishment or any part thereof was undergone, or by production of the warrant of commitment under which the punishment was suffered, together with, in each of such cases, evidence as to the identity of the accused person with the person so convicted or acquitted.

Keep going
Newsletter

Join the top 1% of law aspirants

Get weekly high-yield legal updates, landmark judgment breakdowns, and smart prep strategies sent straight to your inbox.

We never share your email.

Previous year papers

Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.

Download previous year papers

For

We'll never share your email. Promise.

XXV

Chapter XXV

Evidence in Inquiries and Trials

In this chapter

  • 307Language of Courts
  • 308Evidence to be taken in presence of accused
  • 309Record in summonscases and inquiries
  • 310Record in warrant-cases
  • 311Record in trial before Court of Session
  • 312Language of record of evidence
  • 313Procedure in regard to such evidence when completed
  • 314Interpretation of evidence to accused or his advocate
  • 315Remarks Respecting demeanour of witness
  • 316Record of Examination of accused
  • 317Interpreter to be bound to interpret truthfully
  • 318Record in High Court
  • 319When attendance of witness may be dispensed with and commission issued
  • 320Commission to whom to be issued
  • 321Execution of commissions
  • 322Parties may examine witnesses
  • 323Return of commission
  • 324Adjournment of proceeding
  • 325Execution of Foreign commissions
  • 326Deposition of Medical witness
  • 327Identification report of Magistrate
  • 328Evidence of officers of Mint
  • 329Reports of Certain Government Scientific experts
  • 330No formal proof of certain documents
  • 331Affidavit in proof of conduct of public servants
  • 332Evidence of formal character on affidavit
  • 333Authorities before whom affidavits may be sworn
  • 334Previous conviction or acquittal how proved
  • 335Record of evidence in absence of accused
  • 336Evidence of public servants, experts, police officers in certain cases
Previous · Section 333Authorities before whom affidavits may be swornNext · Section 335Record of evidence in absence of accused