Co-operation by doing one of several acts constituting an offence
AI Assist
Summary
When an offence is made up of several distinct acts, anyone who intentionally cooperates by doing any one of those acts, alone or with others, is guilty of the whole offence. The cooperation must be intentional; the acts may occur at different times and can include failing to act. Each person who intentionally cooperates can be convicted of the full offence even if their act was separate.
Example
Priya and Aditya agree to kill their neighbour Z by each giving small doses of poison at different times. Each administers poison as planned and Z dies. Both are guilty of murder because each intentionally cooperated by doing one of the acts, even though their acts were separate.
Bare Act
Enacted textWhen an offence is committed by means of several acts, whoever intentionally co-operates in the commission of that offence by doing any one of those acts, either singly or jointly with any other person, commits that offence.
Illustrations
-
(a) A and B agree to murder Z by severally and at different times giving him small doses of poison. A and B administer the poison according to the agreement with intent to murder Z. Z dies from the effects the several doses of poison so administered to him. Here A and B intentionally co operate in the commission of murder and as each of them does an act by which the death is caused, they are both guilty of the offence though their acts are separate.
-
(b) A and B are joint jailors, and as such have the charge of Z, a prisoner, alternatively for six hours at a time. A and B, intending to cause Z&‘s death, knowingly co-operate in causing that effect by illegally omitting, each during the time of his attendance, to furnish Z with food supplied to them for that purpose. Z dues of hunger. Both A and B are guilty of the murder of Z.
-
(c) A, a jailor, has the charge of Z, a prisoner. A, intending to cause Z&‘s death, illegally omits to supply Z with food; in consequence of which Z is much reduced in strength, but the starvation is not sufficient to cause his death. A is dismissed from his office, and B succeeds him. B, without collusion or co-operation with A, illegally omits to supply Z with food, knowing that he is likely thereby to cause Z&‘s death. Z dies of hunger. B is guilty of murder, but, as A did not co-operate with B. A is guilty only of an attempt to commit murder.
Previous year papers
Pick your exam. we'll email the most recent paper.